Home Legal Services Employment Settlement Agreements for Employees
Written by:Â Owen John, Employment Law Partner, Darwin Gray | Last updated: 24/10/2026 | Reviewed by: Owen John
Restrictive covenants are terms in your employment contract (and often in your settlement agreement) that limit what you can do once you’ve left. The common types are:
The purpose, from the employer’s side, is to protect things like client relationships, confidential information, and a stable workforce after a key person leaves. The effect, from your side, is that they can limit where you work next and what you do, which is why they matter so much when you’re leaving.
If you’re looking at a settlement agreement, the restrictive covenants in it deserve real attention, they can shape your next year or two.
Here’s the key principle: restrictive covenants are only enforceable if they go no further than reasonably necessary to protect a legitimate business interest. The starting point in law is actually that they’re void as a “restraint of trade”, and the employer has to justify them.
A court or tribunal will look at things like:
So a covenant that’s too wide, too long, or not tailored to a real business interest may well be unenforceable. But, and this is important, you can’t simply decide that for yourself and breach it. If you get it wrong, you could face an injunction and a damages claim. Whether a covenant actually bites is a judgement call, and it’s one worth getting right.
Settlement agreements often do one of two things with covenants, and both are worth watching for.
Sometimes they simply restate the covenants from your original contract, as a reminder that they still apply. Sometimes, though, they introduce new or wider restrictions, or re-confirm old ones in a way that’s designed to shore them up (because a freshly agreed, properly compensated covenant is easier for an employer to enforce than a shaky one buried in an old contract).
That second scenario is the one to watch. If you’re being asked to sign up to fresh restrictions as part of your exit, you’re giving something up, and that has a value you can negotiate around. Don’t treat the covenants as boilerplate just because they’re near the back of the document.
Yes, and this is one of the most valuable things we do on a settlement. Because the covenants affect your ability to earn a living, there’s often real room to push back. Depending on your leverage, we can often get restrictions:
Your leverage is usually strongest where the covenants look unenforceable anyway, or where you have potential claims the employer would rather settle. Getting unreasonable restrictions removed or limited in the agreement itself gives you much clearer certainty than hoping they’d be unenforceable if ever tested. This matters especially for directors and senior executives, whose covenants tend to be the widest, and for anyone focused on getting a job after a settlement agreement.
If you breach an enforceable covenant, your former employer can seek an injunction to stop you, and potentially claim damages for losses they’ve suffered. Injunction applications can be fast and expensive. That’s why guessing whether a covenant is enforceable is risky, if you’re wrong, the consequences land quickly. Far better to get the position assessed and, where possible, sorted out in the settlement agreement itself, so you know exactly where you stand before you start your next role.
They can be, but only if they go no further than reasonably necessary to protect a legitimate business interest, like client relationships or confidential information. The legal starting point is that they’re void as a restraint of trade, and the employer has to justify them. Covenants that are too wide, too long, or too geographically broad are often unenforceable. But you can’t safely assume that and breach one, because if you’re wrong you could face an injunction. It’s worth getting the position assessed.
Yes, and it’s often well worth doing. Because covenants affect your ability to earn, there’s frequently room to negotiate them narrower, shorter, or out altogether, especially if they look unenforceable or you have potential claims. Getting restrictions limited in the settlement agreement itself gives you far more certainty than relying on them being unenforceable later. This is one of the most valuable parts of taking advice before you sign.
It varies, but the restriction only lasts as long as is reasonable for the role, and reasonableness is judged tightly. For many employees, three to six months is common for non-compete clauses; twelve months or more tends to appear only for senior people with significant client relationships. A covenant that’s longer than reasonably necessary risks being unenforceable. If yours feels long for your role, that’s often a sign it can be challenged or negotiated down.
If the covenant is enforceable, your former employer can apply for an injunction to stop you, and may claim damages for any losses. Injunction applications can move quickly and cost a lot. That’s why it’s risky to assume a covenant is unenforceable and simply ignore it. The safer route is to get the covenant assessed, and ideally dealt with in your settlement agreement, so you know where you stand before you take your next role.
If your settlement agreement contains restrictive covenants, we’ll tell you whether they’re enforceable, what they mean for your next move, and where there’s room to negotiate. We’re Darwin Gray, one of Wales’ leading employment law firms. You’ll deal directly with your solicitor, and as the only firm in Wales offering full Welsh language employment advice at every level, we can help in Welsh or English.
Get a free, no obligation chat with our employment team. Call 02920 829 100 or use our contact form.
Settlement agreements for employees
Negotiating a settlement agreement
Getting a job after a settlement agreement
Disclaimer: This guide is general information, not legal advice, and employment law changes. For advice on your situation, please speak to a qualified employment solicitor.
This website contains general information based on English and Welsh law and, although we endeavour to ensure that the content is accurate and up to date, users should seek appropriate legal advice before taking or refraining from taking any action. The contents of this site should not be construed as legal advice and we disclaim any liability in relation to its use.