Successful challenge against Article 4 Direction: key implications for property owners

November 11, 2025

By Gwen Hughes

Read time: 4 minutes

A recent case in the High Court considered changes made by a local planning authority to permitted development rights when they issued an Article 4 Direction.

The case highlights the need for local planning authorities to carefully consider the advice received when making such Directions and may cause investors, landlords, and commercial property professionals to consider reviewing and potentially appealing against any Directions.

Our commercial property expert, Gwen Hughes, examines the case and the potential ramifications.

What is an Article 4 Direction?

An Article 4 Direction, in Wales, is a direction by a local planning authority or the Welsh Ministers that certain permitted development rights where planning permission is deemed automatically, no longer applies and a planning permission for that development will need to be made.

On 1 September 2024, Cyngor Gwynedd introduced an Article 4 Direction, which revoked the right to change the use of properties, without planning consent within the following Use Classes:

  • Main Residences (Use Class C3) to Second Homes (Use Class C5) and Short-term Holiday lets (Use Class C6)
  • Second Homes to Short-term Holiday Lets
  • Short-term Holiday Lets to Second Homes

Crucially, it is noted that the Article 4 Direction only covered a ‘material’ change of use. Therefore, if a change of use within the above classes are not material, planning permission would not need to be obtained.

The High Court challenge

An appeal against the Article 4 Decision was brought to the High Court recently in Enlli Angharad Williams, R (on the application of) v Cyngor Gwynedd [2025] EWHC 2395.

What was the reason for the Appeal?

The appeal was brought before the court on the sole ground that Cyngor Gwynedd introduced the Article 4 Direction on a mistaken basis.

The claimant argued that Cyngor Gwynedd introduced the Article 4 Direction on the mistaken assumption that all changes of use between the use classes, would require planning permission. However, a change of use between the use classes which is not a ‘material’ change of use does not require planning permission, regardless of the introduction of Article 4.

The outcome

The Court decided that, when Cyngor Gwynedd decided to implement the Article 4 Direction, members of the Cabinet were materially misled by the officer’s report, to believe that all changes of use would be managed by the Direction. The report did not make the members aware that the Article 4 Direction would only apply to ‘material’ changes of use.

Not every change from a private dwelling to commercial letting would be a material change of use.

Lessons for the future

This judgement highlights many important considerations for Local Planning Authorities

  • Officer reports must clearly explain the distinction between material and non-material changes of use
  • Authorities must ensure they have robust justification for restricting permitted development rights. The validity of any Article 4 Directions may be open to scrutiny where similar situations have occurred

Commercial property owners, investors, developers and landlords should now consider:

  • Reviewing ongoing or planned acquisitions in areas affected by Article 4 Directions
  • Reassessing any planning strategies previously shaped by restrictions that may now be weakened
  • Monitoring potential appeal outcomes, as Cyngor Gwynedd has indicated its intention to challenge the High Court decision

What does the future hold?

The Article 4 Direction was intended to lessen the growth of second homes and holiday lets, which Cyngor Gwynedd argued were pricing out locals from living in their local communities and threatening Welsh Language and Culture, but appears to have been undone by the advice the local planning authority received.

Cyngor Gwynedd is in the process of commencing an appeal in response of the High Court judgement in relation to the Article 4 Direction. A further hearing will decide whether it will be disapplied and its future remains, for now, uncertain.

Until a decision is reached, developers and property owners should proceed cautiously and seek advice where necessary.

Speak to our experts

Our commercial property team can provide clear and practical guidance on the topic discussed above. Get in touch today using the contact form, or via 029 2082 9100 to see how we can help you.

Contact Our Team

To speak to one of our experts today, please contact us on 02920 829 100 or by using our Contact Us form for a free initial chat to see how we can help.

Alun Saunders
Marketing Executive
View Profile
Amanda Scanlon
Executive Assistant
View Profile
Anna Rees
Head of Marketing
View Profile
Caragh McCormack
Trainee Solicitor
View Profile
Catherine Burke
Partner
View Profile
Charles Collar
Solicitor
View Profile
Cindy Thomas
Senior Accounts Manager
View Profile
Damian Phillips
Partner
View Profile
Denna Cather
Office Supervisor
View Profile
Elin Davies
Senior Associate
View Profile
Elliw Jones
Associate
View Profile
Emily Shingler
Senior Associate
View Profile
Erin Phillips
Senior Marketing Executive
View Profile
Fflur Jones
Managing Partner
View Profile
Fiona Hughes
Senior Associate
View Profile
Fiona Sinclair
HR Consultant
View Profile
Gareth Wedge
Partner
View Profile
Georgina Rees
Solicitor
View Profile
Geraint Llyr Williams
Associate
View Profile
Geraint Manley
Trainee Solicitor
View Profile
Gwen Hughes
Solicitor
View Profile
Harriette Loveluck-Edwards
Solicitor
View Profile
Heledd Ainsworth
Solicitor
View Profile
Heledd Evans
Solicitor
View Profile
Holly O’Regan
Trainee Solicitor
View Profile
Kadell Khalid
Secretary / HR Administrator
View Profile
Kate Heaney
Senior Associate
View Profile
Leanne Nixon
Associate
View Profile
Lisa Evans
Paralegal
View Profile
Lloyd Pike
Solicitor
View Profile
Lorna Fraser
Associate
View Profile
Lowri Evans
Paralegal
View Profile
Mark Rostron
Partner
View Profile
Mike Raymond
Solicitor
View Profile
Nick O’Sullivan
Partner
View Profile
Nicole Brendel
Associate
View Profile
Non Kinsey
Associate
View Profile
Oliver Morris
Senior Associate
View Profile
Owen John
Partner
View Profile
Patrick Murphy
Partner
View Profile
Rachel Ford-Evans
Partner
View Profile
Ramyar Hassan
Associate
View Profile
Rhodri Lewis
Partner
View Profile
Sarah Price
Senior Associate
View Profile
Seren Trigg
HR Consultant
View Profile
Siobhan Williams
Senior Associate
View Profile
Siôn Fôn
Senior Associate
View Profile
Siriol Hughes
Paralegal
View Profile
Stephanie Kendall
Solicitor
View Profile
Stephen Thompson
Partner
View Profile
Tiegan James
Solicitor
View Profile
Tracey Holland
Finance Manager
View Profile

What our clients have said...