Perpetrators of harassment at Yorkshire County Cricket Club to face no disciplinary action despite having been found to have made racist comments towards an ex-teammate

November 4, 2021

 

In 2020, professional cricketer Azeem Rafiq came forward with allegations of institutional racism at Yorkshire County Cricket Club (“YCCC”), having been subjected to racist name calling by at least one former teammate during his time playing for the club during two stints between 2008 and 2018.

Despite YCCC’s Chairperson, Roger Hutton, having acknowledged that Rafiq had been the victim of racial harassment, with seven of the 43 allegations upheld in a report produced by an independent panel, YCCC concluded that no disciplinary action should be taken against the perpetrator(s) on the basis that the racially offensive term used towards Rafiq was simply intended as “friendly and good-natured banter”.  It also suggested that Rafiq was guilty of similar behaviour by referring to a colleague as “Zimbo”, which all reasonable commentators agree has entirely different connotations from the racist language used against Rafiq. 

Widespread condemnation has followed the leaked report, with a number of MPs calling for the resignation of YCCC’s board members.  The adverse publicity has also resulted in many of YCCC’s sponsors withdrawing their support of it.

 

The law of harassment

Azeem Rafiq’s claim against YCCC was brought under the Equality Act 2010 (“EqA ”), which is intended to protect employees from discrimination at work because of a protected characteristic, such as race, disability, or sexual orientation.

Under Section 26 EqA, a person (A) unlawfully harasses another person (B) if A engages in unwanted conduct related to a relevant protected characteristic with the purpose or effect of violating B’s dignity, or of creating an intimidating, hostile, degrading, humiliating or offensive environment for B. Whether or not A intended to harass is not a relevant consideration, with the Employment Tribunal instead directed to consider B’s perception of the harassment.

Having previously rejected a settlement offer believed to have been worth around £100,000, the acceptance of which would have been conditional on Rafiq entering a non-disclosure agreement, Rafiq’s claim is set to proceed and the Employment Tribunal’s final decision in this matter will be of great interest to employers and employees alike.

Employers can be held vicariously liable for harassment by their employees.  There is a statutory defence if the employer can show that they took “all reasonable steps” to prevent the harassment.  These could include having Equal Opportunities and Dignity at Work policies and also giving equality and diversity training.  However, the EAT’s recent decision in Allay (UK) Ltd v Gehlen makes clear that for the defence to succeed, any such steps must be reviewed regularly and not be allowed to grow stale.

Employers should also take care in jumping to conclusions if it appears that an employee was taking part in “banter” when they were in fact being subjected to harassment.  In certain situations, appearing to play along with unwanted conduct can be a coping mechanism for employees, particularly if they want to avoid drawing further attention to themselves by objecting to it.

If you are an employee and believe that you have been the victim of harassment, or if you are an employer whose employee has brought a claim of harassment against you, please get in touch with Damian Phillips for an initial free, no obligation conversation to discuss your options.

Email = dphillips@darwingray.com

Direct Dial = 029 2082 9126

 

 

Contact Our Team
Catherine Burke
Partner
View Profile
Damian Phillips
Partner
View Profile
Fflur Jones
Managing Partner
View Profile
Gareth Wedge
Partner
View Profile
Mark Rostron
Partner
View Profile
Nick O’Sullivan
Partner
View Profile
Owen John
Partner
View Profile
Rhodri Lewis
Partner
View Profile
Stephen Thompson
Partner
View Profile

I have worked with Darwin Gray for a number of years and the level of service, professionalism and timely response is second to none. I would highly recommend Darwin Gray to any business.”

Becs Beslee, Dice FM Ltd

Darwin Gray have provided us with a first-class service for many years now. They really take the time to understand our business and develop relationships which results in advice and support that is contextualised and effective.”

Rebecca Cooper, ACT Training

We have worked with Darwin Gray for several years and have always found their services and advice to be first class.”

Karen Gale, Stepping Stones Group

An extremely professional and sincere company who make time for your queries and understand the need to break down certain facts and information to ensure everything is understood perfectly. I would highly recommend the company to anyone looking for any type of legal advice”

Gwawr Booth, Portal Training Ltd

PSS has worked with Darwin Gray for many years. We have always received an excellent service. Prompt and professional advice and support.”

Ledia Shabani, Property Support Services UK Ltd

We have used several departments within DG recently and we have been very pleased with an effective, efficient and down to earth service. Very happy thus far and I expect that we will continue to use DG.”

Guto Bebb, Farmers’ Union of Wales

Darwin Gray offer us truly superb services. Very professional, quick and services available bilingually which is very important to us, highly recommend.”

Iwan Hywel, Mentrau Iaith Cymru

My “go to” in urgent and time sensitive cases for direction, support and advice. The team are quick to respond to calls or emails for advice and support on all matters. Always explain complex matters in a way a lay person can easily understand.”

Margot Adams, Guarding UK Ltd